I started questioning Kennedy when he became involved in Weston A. Price foundation so actively. I felt like I was watching a Infiltration-in-Progress. Sure, on the one hand his name and network bring lots of company and prestige, which folks love and can’t get enough of, obviously. On the other hand, he’s a Red Herring everywhere he goes. And don’t give me this total horseshit that he’s got it so hard cause of his family and oh, what great risks he’s already taking, nonsense! He has loads of options. If he cared that much he could go undercover, change his name or identity, work with those actually changing things, no, instead of just hogging all their screentime and potential audience? What would a truly ethical person do in his position? Ever read the great novel “A Man in Full”? So damn sick of these oligarch families pretending they’re doing everyone some big favor. We used to be far more shrewd about such slime balls in this country. That changed about 150 years ago and we’re about to pay very dearly for that loss of wisdom.
As I remarked in my recent article on this topic, it is important for us to distinguish in our conversations with The True Believers the difference between 'virus' the particle and 'virus' the contagious mythology.
Note: Eric's Inter-View is the 1st I ever heard Dr. Jay speak.
So my opinion is singularly-based, on EFC's Discussion/Debate.
As I listened both closely initially, then multiple times during the weekend, I thought that an intense, "internal-dialogue" was going-on, between-the-two, such that, Dr. Jay was uncovering, but not explicitly saying, certain things, which (I imagine) both he/Eric, agree upon.
I think Dr. Jay, is in a very difficult place professionally, & he, in-a-sense, cannot, or presently (due to family concerns) won't say, for protective purposes, familial, logistical, & financial (he needs to support his family).
I think Eric knew this, on some level, & allowed him to speak.
I THOUGHT THE INTER-VIEW WAS GREAT !
IT SHOULD BE SHOWN TO ALL UNIVERSITY COMMUNICATIONS MAJORS, ON JUST HOW, TO CONDUCT AN INTERVIEW.
Hello Janice, Thank you for posting this Terrain Theory stuff, but if both things are still 'theories' how does one prove one over the other? How do we know there isn't a third 'theory' out there or more? It sure does seem like when one of us gets sick, many of us in my family also get sick with the same thing. How do you disprove that? Forget it's a 'virus' even, what does it mean that we all get sick if one of us does? Is it just heavy metals in the air? GMO food? Micro Plastics in everything? And if it is, why aren't we always sick? I guess with chronic inflammation, maybe we are? Could that inflammation be the cause of every thing? I've been researching this stuff for years,.....and finally have some things that work for me,.....but no guarantees! Even though I do the best I can to eat real food, home eggs, and many other thing, I still get sick sometimes. And why are so many always sick? I have friends who are totally compromised! They have everything in the book,....it's sad.
So many question need to be answered, before one theory can become fact.
I agree 100% that we should question everything. On the other hand, don’t blindly accept an alternative view. The Bailey crowd are rather clueless, they use sophistry and straw man science. At least hear out a fellow dissident that also has some knowledge on virology. There are plenty colourful ones around.
As for myself, I find viruses rather fascinating. Check out some of the scanning electron microscope images of viruses. Also some of the latest technologies being used. And remember, science, similar to critical thinking shrews, use convergent lines of evidence to come to the most likely conclusion.
Thank you Janice...this is very important and I am glad you have written this great article with all the great resources and links!
I started questioning Kennedy when he became involved in Weston A. Price foundation so actively. I felt like I was watching a Infiltration-in-Progress. Sure, on the one hand his name and network bring lots of company and prestige, which folks love and can’t get enough of, obviously. On the other hand, he’s a Red Herring everywhere he goes. And don’t give me this total horseshit that he’s got it so hard cause of his family and oh, what great risks he’s already taking, nonsense! He has loads of options. If he cared that much he could go undercover, change his name or identity, work with those actually changing things, no, instead of just hogging all their screentime and potential audience? What would a truly ethical person do in his position? Ever read the great novel “A Man in Full”? So damn sick of these oligarch families pretending they’re doing everyone some big favor. We used to be far more shrewd about such slime balls in this country. That changed about 150 years ago and we’re about to pay very dearly for that loss of wisdom.
As I remarked in my recent article on this topic, it is important for us to distinguish in our conversations with The True Believers the difference between 'virus' the particle and 'virus' the contagious mythology.
https://fullbroadside.substack.com/p/virologys-fatal-flaw
Jan,
If they 2 have further discussions, whataya think about this:
THE CCR DISCUSSIONS:
Coppolino-Couey Renderings.
[italics]
Prism-Ed To Educate & Captivate con Reflectives.
con = with or thoroughly
(just a thought)
Dear Janice,
This is just my opinion on Dr. Jay.
Note: Eric's Inter-View is the 1st I ever heard Dr. Jay speak.
So my opinion is singularly-based, on EFC's Discussion/Debate.
As I listened both closely initially, then multiple times during the weekend, I thought that an intense, "internal-dialogue" was going-on, between-the-two, such that, Dr. Jay was uncovering, but not explicitly saying, certain things, which (I imagine) both he/Eric, agree upon.
I think Dr. Jay, is in a very difficult place professionally, & he, in-a-sense, cannot, or presently (due to family concerns) won't say, for protective purposes, familial, logistical, & financial (he needs to support his family).
I think Eric knew this, on some level, & allowed him to speak.
I THOUGHT THE INTER-VIEW WAS GREAT !
IT SHOULD BE SHOWN TO ALL UNIVERSITY COMMUNICATIONS MAJORS, ON JUST HOW, TO CONDUCT AN INTERVIEW.
That's my opinion.
Hello Janice, Thank you for posting this Terrain Theory stuff, but if both things are still 'theories' how does one prove one over the other? How do we know there isn't a third 'theory' out there or more? It sure does seem like when one of us gets sick, many of us in my family also get sick with the same thing. How do you disprove that? Forget it's a 'virus' even, what does it mean that we all get sick if one of us does? Is it just heavy metals in the air? GMO food? Micro Plastics in everything? And if it is, why aren't we always sick? I guess with chronic inflammation, maybe we are? Could that inflammation be the cause of every thing? I've been researching this stuff for years,.....and finally have some things that work for me,.....but no guarantees! Even though I do the best I can to eat real food, home eggs, and many other thing, I still get sick sometimes. And why are so many always sick? I have friends who are totally compromised! They have everything in the book,....it's sad.
So many question need to be answered, before one theory can become fact.
Dearest Janice,
Where do I even begin with this ripe & overwhelming Cornucopia !
Well... I'll just have to dig in !
I really loved Your Write Up too !
*
"What [a-]douche bag of epic proportions!"
Unfortuneately, THAT IS Epic !
& NOT ERIC !
**
Being familiar with Long-Time Jon "JR" Silver & Pirate Treasure Gold,
& Now EFC,
I SO AGREE !!
***
Thanx Dear.
I agree 100% that we should question everything. On the other hand, don’t blindly accept an alternative view. The Bailey crowd are rather clueless, they use sophistry and straw man science. At least hear out a fellow dissident that also has some knowledge on virology. There are plenty colourful ones around.
As for myself, I find viruses rather fascinating. Check out some of the scanning electron microscope images of viruses. Also some of the latest technologies being used. And remember, science, similar to critical thinking shrews, use convergent lines of evidence to come to the most likely conclusion.